Characterization of Single Photon Counters: Difference between revisions

From PC5214 wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Zhenyuan (talk | contribs)
Zhenyuan (talk | contribs)
Line 13: Line 13:
To quantify this uncertainty, a known signal was generated (using a function generator) and the frames are recorded as usual. The time of arrival of frames could be inferred by fitting the values of the frames to the known signal.
To quantify this uncertainty, a known signal was generated (using a function generator) and the frames are recorded as usual. The time of arrival of frames could be inferred by fitting the values of the frames to the known signal.


 
<gallery mode="no-lines">
File:Overall_jitter_setup.png|border|Experimental setup to observe the timing jitter of the oscilloscope.
File:Sinewave_dso.gif|border|Oscilloscope during the data collection process.
</gallery>


[[File:results04_01_fitting_of_1HzSine.png|border|1000px|See below for caption]]
[[File:results04_01_fitting_of_1HzSine.png|border|1000px|See below for caption]]
Line 19: Line 22:
[FIG] (a): Sequentially arrived frames represent a sample of the generated waveform. For this plot, a 1Hz sine function was used. (b): The initial fitting of the sine function allows the determination of the frequency of the arrival of frames.
[FIG] (a): Sequentially arrived frames represent a sample of the generated waveform. For this plot, a 1Hz sine function was used. (b): The initial fitting of the sine function allows the determination of the frequency of the arrival of frames.


[[File:results04_02_fitting_of_1HzZigZag.png|border|1000px]]
[[File:results04_02_fitting_of_1HzZigZag.png|border|1000px|See below for caption]]


[FIG] (a): Here a Zigzag waveform was used since the slope is supposed to be constant between the peaks and troughs of the waveform. The frames that are near the peaks and troughs are not used for the line fitting because it may be difficult to identify which line frame corresponds. (b): The fitted line as well as the corresponding coefficient of determination is shown. (c): The average value of the frame obtained is plotted onto the fitted lines. See the next figure for a close-up view.
[FIG] (a): Here a Zigzag waveform was used since the slope is supposed to be constant between the peaks and troughs of the waveform. The frames that are near the peaks and troughs are not used for the line fitting because it may be difficult to identify which line frame corresponds. (b): The fitted line as well as the corresponding coefficient of determination is shown. (c): The average value of the frame obtained is plotted onto the fitted lines. See the next figure for a close-up view.


[[File:results04_03_fitting_of_1HzZigZagScheme.png|border|1000px]]
[[File:results04_03_fitting_of_1HzZigZagScheme.png|border|1000px|See below for caption]]


[FIG] (a): Close up view of the fitted line and the averaged frame value. Inset shows the calculation of the timing jitter of a particular frame. (b): Histogram of the timing jitters of each frame over 71 frames of data. The average absolute jitter is about 500ns while the maximum jitter is about 1400ns.]]
[FIG] (a): Close up view of the fitted line and the averaged frame value. Inset shows the calculation of the timing jitter of a particular frame. (b): Histogram of the timing jitters of each frame over 71 frames of data. The average absolute jitter is about 500ns while the maximum jitter is about 1400ns.]]

Revision as of 02:49, 27 April 2022

Characterization of APDs. Proposed by zhen yuan.

Idea

Count single photons using the photoelectric effect. In simple terms, there is a semiconductor part and an electronics & signal processing part. The semiconductor part is responsible for converting the incident photon into a photoelectron & hole pair. The electronics are responsible for providing the bias voltage to accelerate the photoelectron to create cascading electrons. The electronics are also needed to measure the current and turn that signal into digital signals for a computer to read.

Timing Jitter Of Digital Oscilloscope (model: GDS1072B)

The automated recording of Oscilloscope frames is presumably limited by the baud rate. The reason is that the Oscilloscope is capable of sampling at 1 billion samples per second, assuming samples are 8 bits (discrete values between -128 & 127 inclusive), resulting in 1 GigaByte per second of data transfer. The baud rate used was 1152000B or about 1 MegaByte per second.

A natural question is: what is the timing jitter of the "frames" that are recorded on the computer? Are the frames arriving at a constant rate? What is the deviation of the arrival times?

To quantify this uncertainty, a known signal was generated (using a function generator) and the frames are recorded as usual. The time of arrival of frames could be inferred by fitting the values of the frames to the known signal.

See below for caption

[FIG] (a): Sequentially arrived frames represent a sample of the generated waveform. For this plot, a 1Hz sine function was used. (b): The initial fitting of the sine function allows the determination of the frequency of the arrival of frames.

See below for caption

[FIG] (a): Here a Zigzag waveform was used since the slope is supposed to be constant between the peaks and troughs of the waveform. The frames that are near the peaks and troughs are not used for the line fitting because it may be difficult to identify which line frame corresponds. (b): The fitted line as well as the corresponding coefficient of determination is shown. (c): The average value of the frame obtained is plotted onto the fitted lines. See the next figure for a close-up view.

See below for caption

[FIG] (a): Close up view of the fitted line and the averaged frame value. Inset shows the calculation of the timing jitter of a particular frame. (b): Histogram of the timing jitters of each frame over 71 frames of data. The average absolute jitter is about 500ns while the maximum jitter is about 1400ns.]]

[FIG] Schematic of serial communication via USB connection to the oscilloscope. The left schematic shows the existing communication protocol between the computer and the oscilloscope. The right schematic shows an asynchronous version which could improve the number of frames collected per unit time. However, this schematic was not implemented for this experiment.

[DISCUSSION] There are several factors that may affect the timing jitter of the oscilloscope. The read/write speed of the computer as well as the availability of the I/O process of the computer may be the 2 most important factors. This is because the next frame of data is requested after the computer is done saving the previous frame (see serial communication schematic). The write speed is dependent on the computer disk, which may be between 1MB/s (HDD) to 100MB/s (SSD), and also other computer processes which may be using the disk at the time of data capture. One possibility is to save the data asynchronously as shown in the right schematic, however, this option is not explored for this study.

Experimental Discussion/Results: APD counts vs LED voltage (result03)

This is a caption
This is a caption
This is a caption
This is a caption
This is a caption
This is a caption
This is a caption

Updates/Progress/Changelog

  • 8 Feb 2022:
* Fabrication may not be possible with current resources.
* Instead, we will focus on characterizing existing APDs or photodiodes that are available.
* Seems that there exist some possibly faulty or broken setups of APDs, we may look to troubleshoot them.
* Example of APD characterization done by FYP student from CQT[1] & masters thesis on the same topic [2].
* From the PDF, it seems that the avalanche "pulse" can be measured directly. This begs the question: how does the shape of the pulse correlate to the photon counts?
* Problem posed by Christain: How are single photons defined/characterized?
  • 11 Feb 2022:
* got a working signal from the "homemade" APD! 
* Next is to lower the light intensity of the LED and measure the signal from the APD as a function of LED power.
  • 15 Feb 2022:
* attempted to connect GDS 1072B to laptop. tried the driver, but the oscilloscope could not be detected. 
* will look into the source to debug the driver.
* able to retrieve the data via thumb drive.
* Signal from homemade APD is a negative logic signal. It turns on when a photon causes an electron avalanche. (this is not what we need for the characterization)
* Next, will be using the APD testing kit to test the raw APD.
  • 18 Feb 2022:
* Could not get the APD kit to work. Suspect its because of an open circuit on the board (unsure if this was intended or not).
* the high voltage DC-DC converter seems to be functioning properly and responsive to control voltage.
  • 4 Mar 2022:
* traced and compared schematic to the actual board. slight discrepancies found.
* However, now the plan is to use the DC-DC converter directly to supply high voltage to the APD and measure the response to light.
* The APD is shown to respond to light as expected. 
* Next step is to figure out a way to supply a controlled amount of light and correlate this with the response from APD.
* Also, there is a need to understand the response from APD.
  • 11 Mar 2022:
* recreated APD schematic from data sheet.
* The bare APD is shown to respond to light as expected. 
* May have burnt out APD from the previous step due to lack of resistor.
  • 15 Mar 2022:
* Finally able to retrieve data directly from GDS 1072B ( GDS1072B )
* Installation of the driver is described for others.
* found an opensource python interface for the oscilloscope.
* Next step is to allow for continuous data collection.


Current goals

Obtain enough setup to measure a pulse from an APD. For example:

picture taken from [1]. This is the first goal to achieve before trying to improve


Setup

  • "test" setup:
    • photon source >> laser attenuator >> APD >> ADC >> Raspberry Pi
  • control setup:
    • photon source >> laser attenuator >> "Professional" SPCM >> ADC >> Raspberry Pi

a setup of APD kit, taken from [1]

Equipment needed

Semiconductor device:

  • May need a semiconductor fabrication facility with the ability to make thin films on Silicon.
  • A photodiode or APD to see how it performs.

Analog electronics:

  • Circuit design to convert analog signal to digital signal.

Prebuild devices/hardware:

  • laser source or photon source
  • laser attenuator
  • computer/Raspberry Pi for data processing
  • Analog to Digital Converter (ADCs)
  • "Professional" grade Single Photon Counting Module (SPCM) to characterize experimental setup.
  • Fast oscilloscope.

tl;dr wishlist:

  • Avalanche Photodiodes (need any 1)
    A picture of an APD. SAP series
    • Laser Components SAP500 (passive)
    • Perkin Elmer C30902SH (passive)
    • Perkin Elmer SPCM-AQR-15 (active)
    • MPD PD-050-CTD-FC (active)
  • APD testing kit
  • Laser source
  • Photon attenuator
  • Computer/Raspberry Pi for data processing

Potential Problems

  • Dark noise may be overwhelming, so we may need to find a way to suppress it. (I suspect this is why commercial devices cost $2k-5k)
  • Fabrication cost of the custom semiconductor device may be too high or impractical... gg.com (or we just refurbish an LED/solar panel, this will have lower PDE, but maybe we can use electronics to maximise the PDE.)
  • Electronic circuitry costs. (Unlikely to be too costly)

Gallery

11 Feb:

15 Feb:

18 Feb 2022:

4 Mar 2022:

11 Mar 2022:

15 Mar 2022:
GDS 1072 B actual driver must be downloaded from https://www.gwinstek.com/en-global/products/detail/GDS-1000B
You will need an account to download it. navigate to the "hardware and devices panel" to install the driver.
This screenshot is for windows 10, win10. Openwave softwave can be downloaded from github: https://github.com/zhenyuan992/OpenWave-1KB .
Simply git clone and double click on the OpenWave-1KB.exe file

References